Measurement and systematic study of (n,x) cross sections for dysprosium (Dy), erbium (Er), and ytterbium (Yb) isotopes at 14.7 MeV neutron energy

N. Dzysiuk, A. Kadenko, I. Kadenko, and G. Primenko
Phys. Rev. C 86, 034609 – Published 18 September 2012

Abstract

Background: Neutron activation cross sections for energies around 14 MeV are required for various applications. Because cross-section data for the rare-earth elements are too scarce, there is a need for their accurate measurement and refinement. The accuracy of the evaluation and cross-section trend studies can be improved with reliable experimental data too.

Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to provide measurements of new cross-section data and earlier published cross-section data with much better accuracy for lanthanide elements—Dy, Er, and Yb—and the re-evaluation of available systematics for (n,x) reactions.

Methods: The cross sections for (n,x) reactions were measured at (d-t) neutron energies with the activation technique. Theoretical calculations of cross-section values have been performed with the talys-1.2 code.

Results: The sets of cross sections for (n,p), (n,2n), and (n,α) reactions were analyzed and the systematics were tested over the 156 ≤ A ≤ 176 mass region. The 156Dy(n,p)156Tb and 162Er(n,p)162Ho(m+g) cross-section values at 14.7 MeV neutron energy are reported for the first time. The 176Yb(n,d+pn)175Tm, 176Yb(n,n’α)172Er, 162,163Dy(n,x)162Tb, and 163,164Dy(n,x)163Tb cross sections are obtained with much better accuracy. The reevaluation of systematics for (n,p) cross sections and the reexamination of a presence of isotopic effect in the target nuclei mass range was performed. It was done based on original and earlier available data.

Conclusions: Obtained experimental results can be used for nuclear reaction model testing and could be considered as supplementary ones for nuclear data evaluation. The straight-line systematic dependence for (n,α) cross section was confirmed. For Er isotopes, a clear isotopic effect was observed in case of (n,p) reactions and pointed out the necessity of reconsidering the systematics.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
5 More
  • Received 24 March 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.86.034609

©2012 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

N. Dzysiuk1,2, A. Kadenko2, I. Kadenko1,2,*, and G. Primenko2

  • 1International Nuclear Safety Center of Ukraine, 98A, Vasyl'kivs'ka Street, 01022, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • 2Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 64, Volodymyrs'ka Street, 01601, Kyiv, Ukraine

  • *insc_office@univ.kiev.ua

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 86, Iss. 3 — September 2012

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×