Coulomb excitation of a Am242 isomeric target: E2 and E3 strengths, rotational alignment, and collective enhancement

A. B. Hayes, D. Cline, K. J. Moody, I. Ragnarsson, C. Y. Wu, J. A. Becker, M. P. Carpenter, J. J. Carroll, D. Gohlke, J. P. Greene, A. A. Hecht, R. V. F. Janssens, S. A. Karamian, T. Lauritsen, C. J. Lister, R. A. Macri, R. Propri, D. Seweryniak, X. Wang, R. Wheeler, and S. Zhu
Phys. Rev. C 82, 044319 – Published 29 October 2010

Abstract

A 98% pure 242mAm (K=5, t1/2=141 years) isomeric target was Coulomb excited with a 170.5-MeV Ar40 beam. The selectivity of Coulomb excitation, coupled with the sensitivity of Gammasphere plus CHICO, was sufficient to identify 46 new states up to spin 18 in at least four rotational bands; 11 of these new states lie in the isomer band, 13 in a previously unknown yrast Kπ=6 rotational band, and 13 in a band tentatively identified as the predicted yrast Kπ=5+ band. The rotational bands based on the Kπ=5 isomer and the 6 bandhead were populated by Coulomb excitation with unexpectedly equal cross sections. The γ-ray yields are reproduced by Coulomb excitation calculations using a two-particle plus rotor model (PRM), implying nearly complete ΔK=1 mixing of the two almost-degenerate rotational bands, but recovering the Alaga rule for the unperturbed states. The degeneracy of the 5 and 6 bands allows for precise determination of the mixing interaction strength V, which approaches the strong-mixing limit; this agrees with the 50% attenuation of the Coriolis matrix element assumed in the model calculations. The fractional admixture of the IKπ=66 state in the nominal 65 isomer band state is measured within the PRM as 45.61.1+0.3%. The E2 and M1 strengths coupling the 5 and 6 bands are enhanced significantly by the mixing, while E1 and E2 couplings to other low-K bands are not measurably enhanced. The yields of the 5+ band are reproduced by an E3 strength of 15 W.u., competitive with the interband E2 strength. Alignments of the identified two-particle Nilsson states in Am242 are compared with the single-particle alignments in Am241.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
9 More
  • Received 2 August 2010

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.044319

©2010 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

A. B. Hayes1,*, D. Cline1, K. J. Moody2, I. Ragnarsson3, C. Y. Wu2, J. A. Becker2, M. P. Carpenter4, J. J. Carroll5, D. Gohlke5, J. P. Greene4, A. A. Hecht4,6, R. V. F. Janssens4, S. A. Karamian7, T. Lauritsen4, C. J. Lister4, R. A. Macri2, R. Propri5, D. Seweryniak4, X. Wang4, R. Wheeler5, and S. Zhu4

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA
  • 2Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
  • 3Department of Mathematical Physics, Lund Institute of Technology, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
  • 4Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 5Department of Physics and Astronomy, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, Ohio 44555, USA
  • 6Department of Chemical and Nuclear Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106, USA
  • 7Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Moscow, Russia

  • *hayes@pas.rochester.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 82, Iss. 4 — October 2010

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×