Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Polarization potentials due to inelastic excitations

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dynamic polarization potentials generated by inelastic excitations of the projectile or target nuclei for three scattering systems are compared. Effects due to excitations to bound/unbound states as well as due to different multipolarities are studied. It is shown that the potentials exhibit similar radial dependence at large projectile-target separations; real parts change with the increased radius from repulsive to attractive while imaginary parts, close to zero or even emissive at the nuclear surface, are becoming absorptive at large distances. This general tendency is a consequence of the interplay between Coulomb and nuclear forces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W.G. Love, T. Teresawa, G.R. Satchler, Nucl. Phys. A 291, 183 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. W.Y. So, T. Ugadawa, K.S. Kim, S.W. Hong, B.T. Kim, Phys. Rev. C 76, 024613 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  3. W.Y So, T. Ugadawa, K.S. Kim, S.W. Hong, B.T. Kim, Phys. Rev. C 75, 024610 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.S. Mackintosh, A.M. Kobos, Phys. Lett. B 116, 95 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Sakuragi, Phys. Rev. C 35, 2161 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Athena Pakou, Phys. Rev. C 78, 067601 (2008).

  7. J. Lubian, Nucl. Phys. A 791, 24 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A.A. Ioannides, R.S. Mackintosh, Phys. Lett. B 161, 43 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.S. Mackintosh, N. Keeley, Phys. Rev. C 79, 014611 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. Martel, J. Gómez-Camacho, K. Rusek, G. Tungate, Nucl. Phys. A 641, 188 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. V.P. Verbitsky, K.O. Terenetsky, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 55, 363 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Borowska, K. Terenetsky, V. Verbitsky, S. Fritzche, Phys. Rev. C 76, 034606 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Borowska, K. Terenetsky, V. Verbitsky, S. Fritzche, Phys. Rev. C 79, 044605 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Gómez-Camacho, M.V. Andres, M.A. Nagarajan, Nucl. Phys. A 580, 156 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Rusek, N. Keeley, K.W. Kemper, R. Raabe, Phys. Rev. C 67, 041604(R) (2003).

  16. R.S. Mackintosh, N. Keeley, Phys. Rev. C 70, 024604 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Budzanowski, Phys. Lett. 11, 74 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A.M. Sánchez-Ben’itez, Nucl. Phys. A 803, 30 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. Keeley, Nucl. Phys. A 571, 326 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R.S. Mackintosh, K. Rusek, Phys. Rev. C 67, 034607 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M.A. Franey, P.J. Ellis, Phys. Rev. C 23, 787 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  22. I.J. Thompson, M.A. Nagarajan, J.S. Lilley, M.J. Smithson, Nucl. Phys. A 505, 84 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  23. I.J. Thompson, Comput. Phys. Rep. 7, 167 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lynne McFadden, G.R. Satchler, Nucl. Phys. 84, 177 (1966).

  25. C.E. Bemis jr., F.K. McGowan, J.L.C. Ford jr., W.T. Milner, P.H. Stelson, R.L. Robinson, Phys. Rev. C 8, 1466 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  26. V. Avrigeanu, P.H. Hodgson, M. Avrigeanu, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2136 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  27. N. Keeley, K. Rusek, Phys. Lett. B 427, 1 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  28. B. Buck, A.C. Merchant, J. Phys. G 14, L211 (1988).

  29. A.M. Moro, K. Rusek, J.M. Arias, J. Gómez-Camacho, M. Rodriguez-Gallardo, Phys. Rev. C 75, 064607 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  30. V. Lapoux, Phys. Rev. C 66, 034608 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  31. V. Lapoux, Phys. Lett. B 658, 198 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yu.E. Penionzhkevich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 162701 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  33. L.R. Gasques, D.J. Hinde, M. Dasgupta, A. Mukherjee, R.G. Thomas, Phys. Rev. C 79, 034605 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  34. P.K. Rath, Phys. Rev. C 79, 051601(R) (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. Lubian, T. Correa, P.R.S. Gomes, L.F. Canto, Phys. Rev. C 78, 064615 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Heavy Ion Laboratory, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 5A, 02-093, Warsaw, Poland

    K. Rusek

  2. The Andrzej Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Hoża 69, 00-681, Warsaw, Poland

    K. Rusek

Authors
  1. K. Rusek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Rusek.

Additional information

N. Alamanos

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rusek, K. Polarization potentials due to inelastic excitations. Eur. Phys. J. A 41, 399–404 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2009-10838-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2009-10838-x

PACS

Search

Navigation