Odd-even mass differences from self-consistent mean field theory

G. F. Bertsch, C. A. Bertulani, W. Nazarewicz, N. Schunck, and M. V. Stoitsov
Phys. Rev. C 79, 034306 – Published 9 March 2009

Abstract

We survey odd-even nuclear binding energy staggering using density functional theory with several treatments of the pairing interaction including the BCS, Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov, and the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov with the Lipkin-Nogami approximation. We calculate the second difference of binding energies and compare the results with 443 measured neutron energy differences in isotope chains and 418 measured proton energy differences in isotone chains. The particle-hole part of the energy functional is taken as the SLy4 Skyrme parametrization, and the pairing part of the functional is based on a contact interaction with possible density dependence. An important feature of the data, reproduced by the theory, is the sharp gap quenching at magic numbers. With the strength of the interaction as a free parameter, the theory can reproduce the data to an rms accuracy of about 0.25 MeV. This is slightly better than a single-parameter phenomenological description but slightly poorer than the usual two-parameter phenomenological form c/Aα. The following conclusions can be made about the performance of common parametrization of the pairing interaction: (i) there is a weak preference for a surface-peaked neutron-neutron pairing, which might be attributable to many-body effects, (ii) a larger strength is required in the proton pairing channel than in the neutron pairing channel, and (iii) pairing strengths adjusted to the well-known spherical isotope chains are too weak to give a good overall fit to the mass differences.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 4 December 2008

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.034306

©2009 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

G. F. Bertsch1, C. A. Bertulani2, W. Nazarewicz3,4,5, N. Schunck6, and M. V. Stoitsov6

  • 1Institute for Nuclear Theory and Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • 2Department of Physics, Texas A&M University-Commerce, Commerce, Texas 75429, USA
  • 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
  • 4Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
  • 5Institute of Theoretical Physics, Warsaw University, ul.Hoża 69, PL-00681 Warsaw, Poland
  • 6Institute of Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 79, Iss. 3 — March 2009

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×