Q-value of the superallowed β decay of 62Ga
Introduction
According to the conserved vector current hypothesis (CVC), the matrix elements of the superallowed Fermi transitions between the isobaric analog states (IAS) should all be equal, independent of nuclear structure apart from small terms for radiative and isospin-symmetry breaking corrections. Provided this is true, the experimental values of the comparative half-life (ft) corrected for isospin mixing and radiative corrections , allow for an accurate determination of the weak vector coupling constant . This value combined with the muon decay constant allows the extraction of , the weak coupling matrix element between up and down quarks in the Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa (CKM) quark mixing matrix. Combining this value with other data on the matrix elements of the first row of the CKM matrix, and , it becomes possible to test the unitarity of the CKM matrix and the validity of the electroweak standard model. Depending on which value for is taken from the recent literature, the current world data as reviewed by Hardy and Towner implies a slight failure for the unitarity test by a maximum of 2.4 standard deviations [1]. More recently, a new measurement of the -value of the superallowed β decay of 46V is indicating a need for the re-evaluation of the -values of all the nine best-known cases employed in the unitarity analysis [2]. Therefore, it is now becoming of utmost importance to improve the -value data for these cases as well as to provide accurate data on new cases, as represented by 62Ga studied in this Letter.
Following the notations of Hardy and Towner [1], the true -value for the () decays is obtained using the equation where f is the β decay phase-space factor, t is the partial half-life, K is a constant, , and are radiative corrections and accounts for the isospin-symmetry breaking correction, see Refs. [1], [3] for a detailed discussion on these correction terms. A critical survey of 20 superallowed nuclear β decays [1] shows that the corrected -values are constant to three parts in 104. In the case of the nine best known transitions, the experimental ft-values are known to better than 0.15%. In most of the cases [1], the correction terms (), and , obtained from theory, are the limiting factors for improving the accuracy of the determination of the value of the vector coupling constant . Using Eq. (1) together with the radiative corrections as determined by the theory and assuming the validity of the conserved vector current, the isospin correction can be experimentally determined providing thus important means to improve the theoretical model calculations. Currently, the dominant source of uncertainty in arises from the disagreement between the results from different theoretical calculations.
To extend the well-known cases, it is important to measure new cases where nuclear structure dependent corrections are large or particularly challenging for model calculations. Typically, these are nuclei with as well as heavy nuclei with . Recently, three such cases—22Mg [4], [5], [6], 34Ar [7] and 74Rb [8], [9], [10]—have been studied with high precision for their -value but with only a modest accuracy for the half-life or the superallowed decay branch resulting in more moderate accuracies for their -values ranging between 0.24 and 0.40% [1].
The next heaviest nucleus in the series of , , superallowed β emitters beyond 54Co is 62Ga, which is a particularly interesting nucleus because its β decay half-life has already been determined with high precision in several experiments yielding an average value of () ms [11], [12], [13]. The current value and precision of the experimental branching ratio is ()%. However, possible additional unobserved Gamow–Teller transitions could increase the branching ratio to the excited states in 62Zn, calling for more precise measurements of these transitions [14]. Prior to the present work, the -value of 62Ga has been determined in only one experiment where a β end-point measurement resulted in a value of () keV [15].
In this Letter we present the first precise measurement of the -value and the mass of 62Ga employing a double Penning trap setup connected to the on-line isotope separator IGISOL at the University of Jyväskylä [16]. In the same experiment, the masses of 62Zn and 62Cu were determined using 62Ni as the reference ion whose mass excess is given with 0.6 keV uncertainty in the most recent atomic mass evaluation tables [17].
Section snippets
Experimental method
All nuclei of interest were produced in reactions induced by 48 MeV protons impinging on a 3 mg/cm2 thick enriched 64Zn target. The recoil ions were slowed down and thermalized in the gas cell of an ion guide using 150 mbar helium pressure [18]. The ions were then transported by gas flow and electric fields through a differentially pumped electrode system into high vacuum and accelerated to 30 keV. After mass separation in a 55° dipole magnet the ions were injected into a buffer-gas filled
Results
The experimental setup was first tuned by using 40Ar+ ions produced in collisions between the primary proton beam and argon atoms mixed in helium. Next, the -value of 62Ga was determined by measuring the cyclotron frequencies of 62Ga and 62Zn in repeated successive measurements. The masses of 62Ga, 62Zn and 62Cu were determined using 62Ni as the reference ion. In the relative -value measurements most of the systematic effects cancel out. The only contribution to the uncertainty arises
Discussion
The new experimental value of () keV for the decay energy of 62Ga yields a value of () for the statistical rate function f [1], [26]. The half-life of () ms and the branching ratio of (99.85+0.05−0.15)% yield the final ft-value of (3076.0+2.1−4.8) s for 62Ga. This value, when corrected for radiative and isospin mixing effects according to Table IX of Ref. [1], results in an -value of () which is in good agreement with the current world average
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by the EU within the 6th framework programme Integrating Infrastructure Initiative—Transnational Access, Contract Number: 506065 (EURONS) and within the NIPNET RTD project under Contract No. HPRI-CT-2001-50034. We also acknowledge support from the Academy of Finland under the Finnish Centre of Excellence Programme 2000–2005 (Project No. 44875, Nuclear and Condensed Matter Physics Programme at JYFL) and the Conseil Régional d'Aquitaine. A.J. and H.P. are indebted to
References (28)
- et al.
Phys. Lett. B
(2001) Nucl. Phys. A
(2001)- et al.
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B
(2004) - et al.
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A
(2004) - et al.
Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. Ion Processes
(1995) - et al.
Phys. Rev. C
(2005) - et al.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
(2005) - et al.
Phys. Rev. C
(2002) - et al.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
(2003) - et al.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
(2004)
Phys. Rev. C
Eur. Phys. J. A
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Cited by (53)
Isospin symmetry in the T = 1,A = 62 triplet
2023, Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy PhysicsNuclear Data Sheets for A = 62
2012, Nuclear Data SheetsOverview of recent highlights at ISOL facilities
2008, Nuclear Physics AQ values of the <sup>76</sup>Ge and <sup>100</sup>Mo double-beta decays
2008, Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy PhysicsTowards a magnetic field stabilization at ISOLTRAP for high-accuracy mass measurements on exotic nuclides
2008, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated EquipmentPrecise nuclear physics measurements with ion traps
2009, International Journal of Modern Physics E