Elastic scattering of the proton drip-line nucleus F17

J. C. Blackmon, F. Carstoiu, L. Trache, D. W. Bardayan, C. R. Brune, C. A. Gagliardi, U. Greife, C. J. Gross, C. C. Jewett, R. L. Kozub, T. A. Lewis, J. F. Liang, B. H. Moazen, A. M. Mukhamedzhanov, C. D. Nesaraja, F. M. Nunes, P. D. Parker, L. Sahin, J. P. Scott, D. Shapira, M. S. Smith, J. S. Thomas, and R. E. Tribble
Phys. Rev. C 72, 034606 – Published 26 September 2005

Abstract

Precision data have been obtained for the elastic scattering of F17 on C12 and N14 at 10 MeV/nucleon to clarify the reaction mechanism for loosely bound nuclei at low energies and to assess the validity of a double-folding procedure to predict optical model potentials for use in indirect methods for nuclear astrophysics. The double-folding procedure incorporates density and energy-dependent effective nucleon-nucleon interactions with realistic densities consistent with experimentally determined asymptotic normalization coefficients. The derived potentials provide an excellent description of the data and point to a complete dominance of absorption at the barrier. A semiclassical analysis in terms of multireflection barrier–internal barrier series expansion of the scattering amplitude shows that only the barrier component survives in the scattering process, pointing to the peripheral character of the reactions.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 19 May 2005

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.72.034606

©2005 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

J. C. Blackmon1, F. Carstoiu2,3, L. Trache2, D. W. Bardayan1, C. R. Brune4, C. A. Gagliardi2, U. Greife5, C. J. Gross1, C. C. Jewett5, R. L. Kozub6, T. A. Lewis1, J. F. Liang1, B. H. Moazen6, A. M. Mukhamedzhanov2, C. D. Nesaraja1,6, F. M. Nunes7, P. D. Parker8, L. Sahin9, J. P. Scott1,6, D. Shapira1, M. S. Smith1, J. S. Thomas10, and R. E. Tribble2

  • 1Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
  • 2Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3366, USA
  • 3National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering “Horia Hulubei,” P.O. Box MG-6, RD-76900, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
  • 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA
  • 5Department of Physics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401, USA
  • 6Physics Department, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, Tennessee 38505, USA
  • 7National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 8A. W. Wright Nuclear Structure Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA
  • 9Department of Physics, Dumlupinar University, Kutahya, Turkey 43100
  • 10Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 72, Iss. 3 — September 2005

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×