Skip to main content
Log in

The extrapolation of NEMO techniques to future generation 2β-decay experiments

  • Double-Beta Decay and Rare Processes
  • Published:
Physics of Atomic Nuclei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The possibilities of using NEMO techniques for future neutrinoless double-beta decay experiments are discussed. The main idea is to have a realistic program with planned sensitivity for half-life measurement on the level of ∼(1.5–2)×1026 yr (sensitivity to neutrino mass ∼0.04–0.1 eV). It is argued that this can be achieved using the improved NEMO technique to study 100 kg of 82Se. A possible scheme for a future SUPERNEMO detector and its main characteristics are presented. Such a detector can also be used to investigate 0νββ decay in 100Mo, 130Te, and 116Cd with a sensitivity of up to ∼(2–5)×1025 yr or with a sensitivity to neutrino mass of ∼0.04–0.26 eV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Dassie et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 309, 465 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Arnold et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 354, 338 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. NEMO Collab., Preprint No. 94-29, LAL (1994).

  4. D. Dassie et al., Phys. Rev. D 51, 2090 (1995).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Arnold et al., Z. Phys. C 72, 239 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Arnold et al., Nucl. Phys. A 636, 209 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Arnold et al., Nucl. Phys. A 658, 299 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. S. Barabash et al., Czech. J. Phys. 52, 575 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Arnold et al., Nucl. Phys. A 678, 341 (2000).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. V. Vasilyev et al., in Proceedings of the Symposium on Neutrino and Dark Matter in Nuclear Physics, Nara, Japan, 2003.

  11. Ch. Marquet et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 457, 487 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. R. Elliot et al., Phys. Rev. C 46, 1535 (1992).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Ejiri et al., Phys. Rev. C 63, 065501 (2001).

  14. F. A. Danevich et al., Phys. Rev. C 62, 045501 (2000).

  15. A. Alessandrello et al., Phys. Lett. B 486, 13 (2000).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Suhonen and O. Civitarese, Phys. Rev. C 49, 3055 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Aunola and J. Suhonen, Nucl. Phys. A 643, 207 (1998).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. F. Simkovic et al., Phys. Rev. C 60, 055502 (1999).

  19. S. Stoica and H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, Nucl. Phys. A 694, 269 (2001).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

From Yadernaya Fizika, Vol. 67, No. 11, 2004, pp. 2008–2012.

Original English Text Copyright © 2004 by Barabash.

This article was submitted by the author in English.

The author represents the NEMO Collaboration

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barabash, A.S. The extrapolation of NEMO techniques to future generation 2β-decay experiments. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 67, 1984–1988 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1825516

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1825516

Keywords

Navigation