Prospective candidates for the two-proton decay studies. (II) Exploratory studies of 30Ar, 34Ca, and 45Fe
References (25)
- et al.
Nucl. Phys. A
(1993)et al.Nucl. Phys. A
(1993) - et al.
Nucl. Phys. A
(1995) Phys. Rev. C
(1997)- et al.
Nucl. Phys. A
(2001) - L.V. Grigorenko, I.G. Mukha, I.J. Thompson, M.V. Zhukov, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Exotic...
- et al.
Yad. Fiz.
(1993)Phys. Atomic Nuclei
(1993) - et al.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
(2000) - et al.
Phys. Rev. C
(2001) - et al.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
(2002) - et al.
Nucl. Phys. A
(2002)
Nucl. Phys.
(1996)
Cited by (44)
Recent developments in radioactive charged-particle emissions and related phenomena
2019, Progress in Particle and Nuclear PhysicsCitation Excerpt :As we will see below, this limitation of the diproton model is not seen in all cases. This three-body model was used to analyse a large number of two-proton decay cases in the past [97–100] and even at present (see Ref. [101] and references therein). This is because the formalism contains all ingredients determining the decay process.
Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 43
2015, Nuclear Data SheetsNuclear Data Sheets for A = 34
2012, Nuclear Data SheetsNuclear structure at the proton drip line: Advances with nuclear decay studies
2008, Progress in Particle and Nuclear PhysicsTheory of the two-proton radioactivity in the continuum shell model
2006, Nuclear Physics ALifetime of <sup>26</sup>S and a limit for its 2p decay energy
2011, International Journal of Modern Physics E
Copyright © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.