Skip to main content
Log in

Description of Elastic and Reaction Cross-Sections of Heavy Ions Using Modified Glauber Model

  • Published:
Czechoslovak Journal of Physics Aims and scope

Abstract

The Glauber model for the description of the heavy ion reaction cross-sections and the elastic scattering differential cross-sections was extended to lower energies. This model was modified into modified Glauber model I to take into account the Coulomb distortion of the trajectory. The deflection effect of the trajectory due to the real nuclear potential in addition to the Coulomb effect in the modified Glauber model I were also taken into account in the Glauber model to get the modified Glauber model II. These models are satisfactorily applied for both elastic scattering differential cross-sections and reaction cross-sections for many collisions over a broad energy range. The obtained results reasonably well agree with the previous theoretical calculations and the experimental data. The corrected formula for the optical potential of A. Vitturi and F. Zardi is given. Results of this correction are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.J. Glauber: Lectures on Theoretical Physics. Interscience, New York 1959, Vol. I.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.C. Peng, R.M. DeVries, and N. DiGiacomo: Phys. Lett. B 98 (1981) 244.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S.K. Gupta and P. Shukla: Phys.Re v. C 52 (1995) 3212.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.M. Devris and J.C. Peng: Phys. Rev. C 22 (1980) 1055.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.J.K arol: Phys. Rev. C 11 (1975) 1203.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S.K. Charagi and S.K. Gupta: Phys.R ev.C 41 (1990) 1610.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S.K. Charagi and S.K. Gupta: Phys.R ev.C 46 (1992) 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Vitturi and F. Zardi: Phys.R ev. C 36 (1987) 1404.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.M. Lenz, A. Vitturi, and F. Zardi: Phys. Rev. C 40 (1989) 2114.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S.M. Lenz, A. Vitturi, and F. Zardi: Phys. Rev. C 38 (1988) 2086.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Chauvin, D. Lebrun, A. Lounis, and M. Buenerd: Phys. Rev. C 28 (1983) 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A.Y. Abul-Magd and M.T. Al Hinai: Nuovo Cimento A 110 (1997) 1281.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Xiangzhou, F. Jun, S. Wenqing, M. Yugang, W. Jiansong, and Y. Wei: Phys. Rev. C 58 (1998) 572.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.H. Cha: Phys. Rev. C 46 (1992) 1026.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S.K. Charagi: Phys. Rev. C 48 (1993) 452.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S.K. Charagi: Phys. Rev. C 51 (1995) 3521.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M.Y.H. Farag: Eur. Phys. J. A 12 (2001) 405.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P.J. Karol: Phys. Rev. C 46 (1992) 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Kox, A. Gamp, R. Cherkaoui, A.J. Cole, N. Longequeue, J. Menet, C. Perrin, and J.B. Viano: Nucl. Phys. A 420 (1984) 162.

    Google Scholar 

  20. W. Mitting et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Kox, A.G amp, C.P errin, J.Arvi eux, R. Bertholt, J.F. Bruandet, M. Bruenerd, R. Cherkaoui, A.J. Cole, Y.El-Marsi, N. Longequeue, J. Menet, F. Merchez, and J.B. Viano: Phys. Rev. C 35 (1987) 1678.

    Google Scholar 

  22. I. Tanihata, et al.: Phys.Re v.Le tt. 55 (1985) 2676.

    Google Scholar 

  23. I.T anihata, et al.: Phys.Le tt. B 289 (1992) 261.

    Google Scholar 

  24. W.Q. Shen, et al.: Nucl. Phys. A 491 (1989) 130.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Feng, W.Q. Shen, Y.G. Ma, and Z.Y. Zhu: Phys.Le tt. B 305 (1993) 9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. T. Suziki, H. Geossel, and O. Bochkara: Phys.R ev.Lett. 75 (1995) 3241.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Y.G. Ma, W.Q. Shen, J. Feng, and Y.Q. Ma: Phys. Rev. C 48 (1993) 850.

    Google Scholar 

  28. S.K. Charagi, et al.: Phys. Rev. C 48 (1993) 1152.

    Google Scholar 

  29. I. Brissaud, L. Bimbot, Y. Le Bornec, B. Tatischeff, and Willis: Phys. R ev.C 11 (1975) 1537.

    Google Scholar 

  30. A.I ngemarsson: Phys. Rev. C 56 (1997) 950.

    Google Scholar 

  31. S.M. Lenz, F. Zardi, and A. Vitturi: Nucl. Phys. A 536 (1992) 168.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M.E. Braudan and G.R. Satchler: Phys. Report 285 (1997) 143.

    Google Scholar 

  33. P. Roussel-Chomaz, N. Alamanos, F. Auger, J. Barrette, B. Berthier, B. Fernandez, and L. Papineau: Nucl. Phys. A 477 (1988) 345.

    Google Scholar 

  34. V.K. Lukyanov, B. Stowinski, and E.V. Zemlyanaya: Phys. Atom. Nucl. 64 (2001) 1273.

    Google Scholar 

  35. D.T. Khoa, G.R. Satchler, W. Von Oertzen, and P.I. Tanihata: Phys. Rev. C 56 (1997) 954.

    Google Scholar 

  36. M. Buenerd, A. Lounis, J. Chauvin, D. Lebrun, Ph. Martin, G. Duthamel, J.C. Gondran, and P. de Saintignon: Nucl. Phys. A 424 (1984) 313.

    Google Scholar 

  37. M.E. Braudan, S.H. Fricke, and K.W. McVoy: Phys. Rev. C 38 (1988) 673.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farag, M. Description of Elastic and Reaction Cross-Sections of Heavy Ions Using Modified Glauber Model. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics 52, 927–943 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019813521177

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019813521177

Navigation