SMILETRAP—A Penning trap facility for precision mass measurements using highly charged ions
Section snippets
The development of mass spectrometry
From the very first mass measurements on an atomic scale by J. J. Thomson [1] in the beginning of the 20th century the precision has increased dramatically. In Thomson's cathode ray tube, mass spectra appeared as parabolas on a photographic film due to the large energy spread of the ions created in a high-voltage discharge tube used as ion source. With the vacuum technology available at that time it was impossible to avoid appreciable amounts of hydrogen in the ion source. Thus, in the mass
Merits of highly charged ions
The cyclotron frequency ν of a single ion with rest mass m and charge qe moving perpendicular to a magnetic field B is given by
Though this situation never can be achieved in laboratory experiments this simple formula can be used to discuss the merits of HCI. Let us assume that it is possible to measure this cyclotron frequency somehow (see Section 5.3). In any frequency determination, involving a resonance phenomena, the figure of merit can be defined as m/Δm =ν/Δν, i.e. the mass
Mass determinations using highly charged ions
Mass measurements in a Penning trap are based on a comparison of the cyclotron frequencies of the ion of interest and that of a mass reference ion. If the reference ion is denoted by subscript 1 and the ion whose mass is to be measured by subscript 2 the following relation is obtained:
It is here assumed that the change in the magnetic field can be neglected during the time the cyclotron frequencies of the two ion species are measured. This condition is only fulfilled if
Equations of ion motion in an ideal penning trap
Eq. (1) represents a condition that cannot be realized in laboratory experiments. The magnetic field confines the ions only in a plane perpendicular to the magnetic field. But injected ions have a velocity component also along the magnetic field. Therefore, trapping of ions is done by introducing two retardation electrodes separated by a distance 2z, which limits the ion motion in the direction of the magnetic field. These two electrodes are both required to have surfaces of hyperboloidal shape
Experimental set up and sequence of measurements
The SMILETRAP—experiments involve mainly the following parts;
an electron beam ion source CRYSIS connected to an isotope separator for production of HCI,
an ion transport system,
a charge selection magnet,
a retardation trap where also H2+ ions can be produced as a mass reference,
beam elements between the retardation trap and the precision trap,
a hyperboloidal Penning trap where the precision mass measurements are done by exciting the ions and detecting their time-of-flight (TOF).
In the following
The real trap versus the ideal trap
In the discussion of Penning trap properties we have so far identified a number of measures which have to be taken for reaching highest possible precision. The order given is related to the magnitude of the effects in terms of changes in the cyclotron frequency.
- a.
A very stable trap temperature close to the trap is required. Changes cause magnetic field disturbances due to the susceptibility of the construction material, in particular, that one of the precision trap and the stainless steel vacuum
Accuracy limitations
There are several sources of error to be considered due to limitations in our experimental equipment and procedures which can cause frequency shifts and thus give rise to systematic uncertainties
- 1.
Instabilities in the magnetic field
- 2.
Instabilities in the trap voltage
- 3.
Ion interaction with the mirror charge in the ring of the precision trap
- 4.
Ion–ion interaction
- 5.
Ion-rest gas interaction
- 6.
Relativistic mass increase
- 7.
Uncertainty in the total binding energy of the HCI
- 8.
Uncertainty in the mass of the reference ions
- 9.
Present accuracy of stable isotopes and summary of results
The recent technical improvements of SMILETRAP allow mass uncertainties of about 1 ppb in routine measurements of light ions lasting for about 20 h. In doublet mass measurements with q/A=0.5 uncertainties of a few times 10−10 can be achieved. There are several hundred stable isotopes many of them having a mass uncertainty ⪢1 ppb (Fig. 22). It would be rather meaningless to systematically improve hundreds of mass values only in order to make the mass tables more attractive. We have, therefore,
Future and outlook
There are a few obvious measures to be taken which would improve the performance of SMILETRAP.
- a.
Increase of the excitation time
- b.
Implementation of the Ramsey fringe technique
- c.
Cooling of the ions in the pretrap
- d.
Combining SMILETRAP with an electron beam ion trap (EBIT) at a 250 kV platform.
Conclusions
It should be emphasized that the SMILETRAP facility is the only one that has measured masses of ions with q⪢8+. At the accelerator facility GSI in Darmstadt there is a recently approved project named HITRAP that aims at producing very HCI of radioactive as well as stable isotopes, as for example 238U ions with the three highest charge states. These ions are produced at very high energies and slowed down, first in the storage ring ESR and then further retarded in some decelerator device. Our
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the support from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, The Carl Trygger Foundation, The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation, The Swedish Natural Research Council, The European Community Science and TRM-Programs and The Manne Siegbahn Laboratory.
In particular, we appreciate the confidence that the Wallenberg Foundation has shown us from the start of the SMILETRAP project, which in the beginning looked rather hypothetical with several seemingly week features.
The
References (59)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
(1994)et al.Phys. Scripta, T
(1995)- T. Schwarz, Thesis, (Hochpräzise Massenbestimmung hochgeladener Ionen mit SMILETRAP) Precision mass measurements using...
Philos. Mag.
(1907)- F.W. Aston, Bakerian Lecture, Philos. Mag....
- et al.
Z. Physik.
(1934)Proc. Am. Phys. Soc.
(1955)Phys. Rev.
(1951)Rev. Sci. Instrum.
(1950)Phys. Rev.
(1950) Rev. Sci. Instrum.
(1971)Phys. Rev. Lett.
(1991)Phys. Rev. C
(1971)- et al.
Nucl. Phys., A
(1995)Hyperfine Interactions
(1996)D. Lunney, et al., Proceedings of the Conference Trapped Charged Particles and Fundamental Physics, Asilomar, 1998, p.... Phys. Scripta, T.
(1995)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Phys. Scripta, T
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Phys. Scripta, T
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Phys. Scripta T
Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A
Phys. Scripta
Phys. Scripta T
Rev. Mod. Phys.
Phys. Scripta
Cited by (104)
Nuclear Structure and Decay Data for A=76 Isobars
2024, Nuclear Data SheetsVacuum requirements for Penning trap mass spectrometry with highly charged ions
2020, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and AtomsNuclear Data Sheets for A=40
2017, Nuclear Data SheetsDevelopment of a high-precision Penning trap magnetometer for the LEBIT facility
2015, International Journal of Mass SpectrometryCitation Excerpt :The mass of an atom or nucleus is one of its most fundamental properties and is important for various studies in physics. Many Penning Trap Mass Spectrometry (PTMS) facilities throughout the world [1–13] have been used to perform high-precision mass measurements on stable, long-lived, and short-lived isotopes in recent years to investigate nuclear shell structure, halo nuclei, nuclear astrophysics, determinations of beta decay Q-values, and tests of fundamental interactions and of the Isobaric Multiplet Mass Equation (IMME). PTMS facilities have achieved mass measurement fractional precisions as small as 7 parts in 10−12 for stable isotopes [14] and less than 10−8 for unstable isotopes [15,16].
Classical calculation of relativistic frequency-shifts in an ideal Penning trap
2014, International Journal of Mass SpectrometryThe most precise atomic mass measurements in Penning traps
2013, International Journal of Mass SpectrometryCitation Excerpt :In parallel with image-charge detection, time-of-flight (TOF) detection [7,8] of cyclotron excitation has been developed by nuclear physicists whose usual aim is to measure masses of short-lived nuclei at ∼keV/c2 absolute precision, see the accompanying article by H.-J. Kluge. The SMILETRAP group at the University of Stockholm has also used TOF detection with highly charged ions to produce some of the most precise measurements of stable isotopes, especially of light ions [9]. The rest of this article is organized as follows.