Emission of unstable clusters from hot Yb compound nuclei

R. J. Charity, L. G. Sobotka, J. Cibor, K. Hagel, M. Murray, J. B. Natowitz, R. Wada, Y. El Masri, D. Fabris, G. Nebbia, G. Viesti, M. Cinausero, E. Fioretto, G. Prete, A. Wagner, and H. Xu
Phys. Rev. C 63, 024611 – Published 23 January 2001
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

Neutrons and isotopically resolved light charged particles have been detected in coincidence with evaporation residues produced in the reaction E/A=11MeV 60Ni+100Mo. Multiplicities of evaporated particle-unstable clusters have been determined from correlations in the emission of these light particles. The decay of the short-lived 5He and 8Be (E*=3.04MeV) states was found to be affected by the Coulomb field of the compound nucleus in accordance with theoretical estimates. The contributions to the measured kinetic-energy distributions of stable fragments from the sequential decay of the unstable clusters was examined. Overall, the contributions from secondary fragments do not greatly influence the spectral shapes and specifically the location of the spectral peaks are not significantly shifted down in energy due to the presence of these secondary fragments. Therefore contrary to the suggestion of Charity et al. [Phys. Rev. C 56, 873 (1997)], the lower peak energy of the experimental α-particle spectrum as compared to standard statistical-model calculations cannot be attributed to sequential α particles from 5He and other clusters. Only for the extreme “subbarrier” regions of the α-particle, deuteron, 6,7Li, and 8Be spectra was the sequential contribution found to be dominant. Statistical-model calculations incorporating large initial deformations are shown to provide enhancements in the yield of low-energy fragments which are roughly appropriate for all the detected isotopes. This suggests that the origin of the sub-barrier enhancements may be a result of evaporation from highly deformed systems which are either produced dynamically during the fusion process or by thermal shape fluctuations.

  • Received 13 June 2000

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.63.024611

©2001 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

R. J. Charity and L. G. Sobotka

  • Department of Chemistry, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130

J. Cibor*, K. Hagel, M. Murray, J. B. Natowitz, and R. Wada

  • Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843

Y. El Masri

  • Institut de Physique Nucléaire, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

D. Fabris, G. Nebbia, and G. Viesti

  • INFN and Dipartimento di Fisica, Universitá di Padova, I-35131 Padova, Italy

M. Cinausero, E. Fioretto, and G. Prete

  • INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, I-35020 Legnaro (Padova), Italy

A. Wagner and H. Xu

  • National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

  • *Present address: H. Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kraków, Poland.
  • Present address: Forschungszentrum Rossendorf e.V., Dresden, Germany.

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 63, Iss. 2 — February 2001

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×