Elsevier

Physics Letters B

Volume 461, Issues 1–2, 19 August 1999, Pages 22-27
Physics Letters B

Core excitation in 11Begs via the p(11Be,10Be)d reaction

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00825-4Get rights and content

Abstract

The p(11Be,10Be)d reaction has been studied using a radioactive 11Be beam of 35.3 MeV/nucleon. Differential cross sections have been compared with Distorted Wave Born Approximation calculations, using bound state form factors determined by solving the particle-vibration coupling equations. Calculated cross sections corresponding to a 16% core excitation admixture in the 11Begs wave function are in good agreement with the present data.

Introduction

Much effort has been devoted to the understanding of the light neutron-rich 11Be nucleus, since the observation of a parity inversion between its ground state (Jπ=1/2+) and its first excited state at 0.32 MeV (Jπ=1/2) several decades ago. This interest in 11Be was further enhanced following experimental evidence for a neutron “halo” around the 10Be core 1, 2. Various theoretical calculations 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12have attempted to reproduce the level sequence in this benchmark halo nucleus. Most models emphasize the role of coupling between the valence neutron and the first excited 2+ state at 3.34 MeV in 10Be core in generating the parity inversion, but they predict very different core excitation admixtures in the 11Begs wave function, varying from 7% 6, 10to 75% [3]. In this context, it is important to get experimental information on the relative weights of its [0+⊗2s] and [2+⊗1d] components, which may be provided by measuring the cross sections of one-neutron pick-up reactions feeding the 0+gs and 2+1 states in 10Be.

This letter reports a study of the structure of 11Begs by means of the (p,d) reaction in inverse kinematics. This experiment may be considered as a testing ground for future investigations of exotic nuclei via transfer reactions induced by radioactive beams. Preliminary data have been reported in Refs. 13, 14, together with the first results of a standard DWBA analysis, which used single-particle form factors evaluated according to the usual Separation Energy (SE) prescription. Spectroscopic factors deduced from this preliminary analysis indicate a very large [2+⊗1d] admixture in the 11Begs wave function, exceeding most theoretical predictions [14]. However, such a comparison between experiment and structure calculation via spectroscopic factors assumes that the radial wave function uj(r) may be approximated by the product of the single-particle form factor times a spectroscopic amplitude. This assumption is in fact questionable, considering the large deformation parameter of the final nucleus 10Be (β2=0.74 [15]), which could induce important coupling effects. Under such conditions, correct form factors should be taken as solutions of coupled equations [16]. The present (p,d) transfer reaction data are compared with the results of DWBA calculations, using bound state form factors evaluated in the framework of the particle-vibration coupling model [17], in order to assess the magnitude of this effect.

Section snippets

Experiment and results

The 11Be(p, d)10Be reaction was studied in inverse kinematics, using a 11Be secondary beam of 35.3 MeV/nucleon, produced by fragmentation of 15N in the SISSI device at GANIL. The 10Be nuclei were analyzed by the energy-loss SPEG spectrometer placed at 0°. A 50-μm thick (CH2)n target was used. Particle identification and momentum and angle measurements were provided by the standard SPEG focal plane detection system. Information on the incident angle at the target position was provided by two XY

Bound state form factors

Bound state form factors for neutron transfer were calculated assuming a vibrational coupling between the 10Be core and the halo neutron. The assumption of a vibrational 10Be core is based on the known second 0+ and 2+ states at about twice the energy of the first 2+ state. The interaction Hamiltonian was taken from Ref. [17]and the radial form factors ulj(r) were calculated by solving the resulting set of coupled equations [18]using the code CCVIB [19]. The configuration space for the 1/2+

Calculation of transfer cross sections

Theoretical cross sections were calculated with the zero-range DWBA code DWUCK4 [21]using a (p,d) normalization factor of 2.29. These calculations were performed without finite-range and non-locality corrections. Various sets of proton and deuteron optical potentials, generally extrapolated from available elastic scattering analyses of medium to heavy mass nuclei, were tried. The calculated curves in Fig. 2 were obtained using the adiabatic approximation of Johnson and Soper 22, 23which

Summary

The 1H(11Be,10Be)2H reaction has been investigated in order to provide insight on the structure of 11Begs. The present analysis has attempted to relate the large cross section experimentally observed for the excitation of the 2+ state at 3.37 MeV with the amount of [2+⊗1d] core excited component in the ground state wave function. A standard (p,d) reaction analysis using single particle form factors in DWBA calculations gives a core excitation admixture ≥30%. However, the validity of these

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Dr. F.M. Nunes for providing the 11Be wave functions from rotational coupling calculations and Dr. N. Vinh-Mau for fruitful discussions. We also acknowledge the contribution of the GANIL crew to this experiment. Financial support from the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (France) and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (UK) is gratefully acknowledged. One of us (J.S.W.) was supported by an EPSRC Visiting Fellowship (Grant No. DMR162/384) at the

References (26)

  • I Tanihata

    Phys. Lett. B

    (1988)
  • N Vinh Mau

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1995)
  • F.M Nunes et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1996)
  • P Descouvemont

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1997)
  • D.L Auton

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1970)
  • W.T Pinkston et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1965)
  • J Van de Wiele et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1996)
  • B Zwieglinski et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1979)
  • P.G. Hansen, A.S. Jensen, B. Jonson, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 45 (1995) 591 and refs....
  • I. Ragnarsson, Proc. Int. Workshop on Science of intense radioactive beams, Los Alamos...
  • E.K Warburton et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1992)
  • T Otsuka et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1993)
  • H Esbensen et al.

    Phys. Rev. C

    (1995)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text