Spectroscopy of F20 levels

S. Raman, E. K. Warburton, J. W. Starner, E. T. Jurney, J. E. Lynn, P. Tikkanen, and J. Keinonen
Phys. Rev. C 53, 616 – Published 1 February 1996
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

From a study of the F19(n,γ) reaction with thermal neutrons incident on a Teflon target, 168 γ rays have been detected and incorporated into a level scheme of F20 consisting of 35 previously known levels and a new one at 5939 keV. Two low-energy primary E1 transitions of energies 584 and 665 keV together account for more than half of the total capture cross section. They populate, respectively, states at 6018 and 5936 keV (both Jπ=2). These states are also excited strongly in the F19(d,p) reaction. From each of these states, 17 γ rays were observed to the lower-lying states. These γ rays constitute the largest number of branches reported from any nuclear bound state. A weak (6±1μb)γ ray of energy 4630.6±0.9 keV, placed as a transition between the neutron-capturing state (which is a 0+ and 1+ mixture) and the 1971-keV, (3) state, might represent the first observation of a primary M2 transition in the (n,γ) reaction. The total thermal-neutron-capture cross section of F19 was measured as 9.51±0.09 mb; and the neutron separation energy of F20 as 6601.35±0.04 keV. Estimates of direct neutron capture have been made using physically realistic optical-model parameters. These model estimates are in reasonable agreement with the measured (partial) cross sections. While constructing the (n,γ) level scheme, the existing data on bound levels in F20 were critically evaluated.

The lifetime values for many levels are poorly known. Therefore, the lifetimes for 25 levels were measured by the Doppler-shift-attenuation method using the inverse reaction H2(19F, pγ) on implanted deuterium targets. The experimental level properties such as excitation energies, Jπ assignments, branching ratios, and lifetimes have been compared with the results from a large-basis shell-model calculation. The agreement was found to be quite good, but this comparison points out also the need for acquiring new data to give more definitive Jπ assignments. © 1996 The American Physical Society.

  • Received 4 August 1995

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.53.616

©1996 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

S. Raman

  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831

E. K. Warburton

  • Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973

J. W. Starner, E. T. Jurney, and J. E. Lynn

  • Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545

P. Tikkanen and J. Keinonen

  • University of Helsinki, Accelerator Laboratory, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 53, Iss. 2 — February 1996

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×