The Nolen-Schiffer anomaly and isospin symmetry breaking in nuclear matter☆
References (23)
Phys. Lett.
(1964)- et al.
Phys. Rep.
(1990) Nucl. Phys. A
(1976)- et al.
Few Body Systems
(1992)et al.Phys. Lett. B
(1993) - et al.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
(1991)et al.Z. Phys. A
(1991)et al.Nucl. Phys. A
(1993) - et al.
Phys. Rep. C
(1982) - et al.
Phys. Rep. C
(1987)et al.Phys. Rev. C
(1992) Nucl. Phys. A
(1972)- et al.
Phys. Rev. C
(1986) - et al.
Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci.
(1969)
Rep. Prog. Phys.
Cited by (72)
Can the PREX-2 and CREX results be understood by relativistic mean-field models with the astrophysical constraints?
2023, Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy PhysicsQuark–Meson-Coupling (QMC) model for finite nuclei, nuclear matter and beyond
2018, Progress in Particle and Nuclear PhysicsCitation Excerpt :It is interesting to note that the QMC model predicts a negative neutron skin in 40Ca, in agreement with experiment [D.P. Watts, Personal communication] and some ab initio models [G. Hagen et al., Personal communication]. We observe that when the QMC model is supplemented by the addition of an isovector scalar field, the in-medium variation of the neutron–proton mass difference can provide a semi-quantitative explanation [86] of the Okamoto–Nolen–Schiffer anomaly [87–89]. While the vast majority of the investigations of the importance of a change of hadron structure in-medium have been based upon the MIT bag model, its limitations have led to developments involving more sophisticated models of hadron structure.
δ Meson effects on neutron stars in the modified quark-meson coupling model
2010, International Journal of Modern Physics ENaturalness, isospin breaking in nuclear matter and the Okamoto-Nolen-Schiffer anomaly
2010, International Journal of Modern Physics DQCD-based charge symmetry breaking interaction and the Okamoto-Nolen-Schiffer anomaly
2024, Physical Review C
- ☆
This work was supported by the Australian Research Council.