Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Properties of intermediate width structure in <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><mmultiscripts><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi></mrow><mprescripts></mprescripts><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>12</mn></mrow><mrow></mrow><mrow></mrow></mmultiscripts></mrow></math><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>12</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math>C<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><msup><mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>12</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math>C<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><msup><mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>12</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math>C (<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><msubsup><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>+</mo></mrow></msubsup></mrow></math>)’ ’’

We point out some of the ambiguities inherent in the phase-shift analysis of our inelastic scattering data.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.39.2084

Physics Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

Click to Expand

Physical Review C