Density dependence in the two-nucleon effective interaction at 135 MeV

J. J. Kelly, W. Bertozzi, T. N. Buti, J. M. Finn, F. W. Hersman, C. Hyde-Wright, M. V. Hynes, M. A. Kovash, B. Murdock, B. E. Norum, B. Pugh, F. N. Rad, A. D. Bacher, G. T. Emery, C. C. Foster, W. P. Jones, D. W. Miller, B. L. Berman, W. G. Love, J. A. Carr, and F. Petrovich
Phys. Rev. C 39, 1222 – Published 1 April 1989
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

Differential cross sections and analyzing powers for scattering of 135-MeV protons by O16 have been measured for all narrow states below 12.1 MeV of excitation up to a momentum transfer of 3.2 fm1. Calculations that employ accurate transition densities fitted to electroexcitation data are used to study medium modifications to the two-nucleon effective interaction with little residual uncertainty from nuclear structure. Definitive evidence for strong density dependence in the isoscalar spin-independent central component of the two-nucleon effective interaction has been found. The differential cross sections show that as the density increases, the strength of the central interaction is suppressed at low momentum transfer and enhanced at high momentum transfer. The analyzing powers exhibit strong negative excursions near 2.5 fm1, which support enhanced repulsion at high density. The data are well described by the local-density approximation, which employs the nuclear-matter effective interaction appropriate to the density in the vicinity of the interacting nucleons. We find that the qualitative results are insensitive to ambiguities in the local-density prescription, the local-exchange approximation, and the choice of distorted waves. However, effective interactions based upon the Paris, Bonn, and Hamada-Johnston potentials do give substantially different results. Of these, the Paris-Hamburg effective interaction provides the best description of normal-parity isoscalar transitions. The analysis also supports a rearrangement contribution to the effective interaction for inelastic scattering.

  • Received 31 October 1988

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.39.1222

©1989 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

J. J. Kelly

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742

W. Bertozzi, T. N. Buti, J. M. Finn, F. W. Hersman, C. Hyde-Wright, M. V. Hynes, M. A. Kovash, B. Murdock, B. E. Norum, B. Pugh, and F. N. Rad

  • Department of Physics and Laboratory for Nuclear Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

A. D. Bacher, G. T. Emery, C. C. Foster, W. P. Jones, and D. W. Miller

  • Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47401

B. L. Berman

  • Department of Physics, George Washington University, Washington, D.C. 20052

W. G. Love

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602

J. A. Carr

  • Supercomputer Computations Research Institute and Department of Physics Astronomy, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306

F. Petrovich

  • Department of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 39, Iss. 4 — April 1989

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×