Elsevier

Nuclear Physics A

Volume 465, Issue 3, 13 April 1987, Pages 550-572
Nuclear Physics A

Real and imaginary parts of the microscopic optical potential between nuclei in the sudden and adiabatic approximation and its application to medium energy 12C-12C scattering

https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(87)90364-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Real and imaginary parts of the optical potential between two nuclei have been calculated from the realistic two-nucleon interaction of Reid using the approach of Faessler and collaborators but with the following modifications: (a) A surface curvature term proportional to the square of the gradient of the density has been added to the energy density functional and the parameters are determined so as to reproduce the binding energies and rms radii of nuclei considered and (b) in addition to the sudden approximation, an adiabatic situation is also considered. Whereas, in the sudden approximation the density of the composite system is obtained by adding the densities of the two colliding nuclei, in the adiabatic approximation, the maximum density in the composite system is limited to the saturation value while conserving the nucleon number. Although the real part of the potential is in the center quite different in these two approximations, the cross sections are not. The real and imaginary parts of the optical potential are calculated for the nuclear pairs 12C+12C, 16O+16O, 40Ca+40Ca and 208Pb+208Pb for relative momenta per nucleon kr = 0 and 1 fm−1. Elastic, inelastic and reaction cross sections are calculated for 12C+12C scattering at Elab = 300, 360 and 1016 MeV using the calculated potential and coupling the elastic channel to the 2+ at 4.44 MeV and 3 at 9.64 MeV, and compared with the experimental data. The agreement with the data at 1016 MeV is satisfactory and the theory can also reproduce the general trend of the angular distributions at 300 and 360 MeV but the calculated values at larger angles overestimate the data. The energy dependence and the magnitude of the observed reaction cross section are well reproduced by the theory.

References (24)

  • T. Izumoto et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1980)
    T. Izumoto et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1981)
  • A. Faessler et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1984)
    M. Trefz et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1985)
  • K.A. Brueckner et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1968)
    K.A. Brueckner et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1969)
  • C.W. De Jager et al.

    At. Data and Nucl. Data Tables

    (1974)
  • W.D. Myers et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1966)
  • D.R. Alexander et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1972)
  • S.B. Khadkikar et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1981)
  • M. Rhoades-Brown et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1984)
    M. Rhoades-Brown et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1984)
  • J.S. Blair
  • D.L. Hendrie

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1973)
  • W. von Oertzen

    Frontiers in nuclear dynamics

  • Y. Sakuragi et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1984)
  • Cited by (60)

    • Shallow folding potential for <sup>16</sup>O + <sup>12</sup>C elastic scattering

      2006, Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by the Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

    1

    Permanent address: Physics Dept, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901, USA.

    View full text