Elsevier

Nuclear Physics A

Volume 474, Issue 2, 23 November 1987, Pages 451-483
Nuclear Physics A

Fragmentation properties of 6Li

https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(87)90626-9Get rights and content

Abstract

The α+d and t+τ cluster structure of 6Li is described in a microscopic α+d cluster model through quantities that enter into the description of cluster fragmentation processes. The states of the separate clusters α, d, t and τ are described as superpositions of 0s Slater determinants belonging to different potential size parameters. The model state space of 6Li is a tensor product of the α and d cluster state spaces and the state space of zero-orbital-momentum relative motion, restricted by antisymmetrization. To describe both the 6Li and fragment states realistically, we constructed nucleon-nucleon forces optimized for the model state spaces used. The fragmentation properties calculated are the g.s. fragmentation (or reduced-width) amplitudes, their squared Fourier transforms, the corresponding potential overlaps, the spectroscopic factors Sαd, Stτ and the αd asymptotic normalization constant Cαd. The forces constructed reproduce the energies and charge radii of 6Li as well as of the fragments excellently. The fragmentation properties predicted by them slightly differ from those calculated with some forces of common use provided the latter are modified so as to reproduce the α, d and 6Li energies. The fragmentation properties change moderately in comparison with simpler versions of the cluster model. The full model yields Sαd=0.93, Stτ=0.58 and Cαd=3.3. The results are consistent with phenomenological estimates except for Cαd. The shape of our αd fragmentation amplitudes are in accord with α+p+n three-body calculations but our Sαd and Cαd are substantially larger. We attribute this discrepancy to the neglect of the Pauli effects in the usual three-body formula for the αd fragmentation amplitude. We give a formula which contains the necessary remedy.

References (61)

  • I.V. Kurdyumov et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1970)
    Yu.A. Kudeyarov et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1971)
  • J.D. Garrett et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1972)
    R.A. Lindgren et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1974)
  • R.G. Lovas

    Z. Phys.

    (1985)
  • A. Hasegawa et al.

    Prog. Theor. Phys.

    (1971)
  • R. Beck et al.

    Ann. of Phys.

    (1987)
  • J. Bang et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1979)
  • D.R. Lehman et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1982)
  • W.C. Parke et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1984)
  • W. Dollhopf et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1975)
  • R.G.H. Robertson et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1981)
  • P.G. Roos et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1977)
  • A.M. Young et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1970)
  • E. Ventura et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1971)
  • M. Lattuada et al.

    Nuovo Cim.

    (1984)
  • H. Horiuchi

    Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.

    (1977)
  • F. Tanabe et al.

    Prog. Theor. Phys.

    (1975)
  • D.R. Thompson et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1977)
  • R.C. Barrett et al.

    Nuclear sizes and structure

  • C.R. Ottermann et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1985)
  • A.T. Kruppa et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1986)
    R.G. Lovas et al.
  • R.G. Lovas et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1983)
  • R.G. Lovas et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1984)
  • R. Shyam et al.

    J. of Phys.

    (1985)
  • J.J. Hamill et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1983)
  • J.V. Noble

    Phys. Lett.

    (1975)
  • R. Krivec et al.

    J. of Phys. G8

    (1982)
  • S. Nakaichi-Maeda et al.

    Z. Phys.

    (1984)
  • L.D. Blokhintsev et al.

    Fiz. Elem. Chastits At. Yadra 8

    (1977)
    L.D. Blokhintsev et al.

    Sov. J. Part. Nucl.

    (1977)
  • D.F. Jackson
  • K. Wildermuth et al.

    A unified theory of the nucleus

    (1977)
  • Cited by (36)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Present and permanent address.

    Deceased.

    View full text