Test of the triaxial rotor model and the interacting boson fermion approximation model description of collective states in Ir191

F. K. McGowan, N. R. Johnson, I. Y. Lee, W. T. Milner, C. Roulet, J. Hattula, M. P. Fewell, Y. A. Ellis-Akovali, R. M. Diamond, F. S. Stephens, and M. W. Guidry
Phys. Rev. C 33, 855 – Published 1 March 1986
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

Coulomb excitation of states in Ir191 up to J=(21/2) has been observed with 160-MeV Ar40 and 617-MeV Xe136 ions. Most of these states are grouped into three rotational-like bands based on the (3/2)+ ground state, the 1/2+ first excited state, and the (7/2)+ γ-vibrational-like state at 686 keV. The average deviation between experimental and theoretical energies for 20 states is 45 keV for the particle-asymmetric-rigid-rotor model and 125 keV for the interacting boson fermion approximation model [limited to broken Spin(6) symmetry, and only the d3/2 orbital is considered]. The overall agreement of both model predictions with experimental γ-ray yields for transitions within the (3/2)+ band is quite good. For interband transitions originating in the K=1/2+ and (7/2)+ bands, the interacting boson fermion approximation model tends to underestimate the γ-ray yields by one to two orders of magnitude. These six moderately collective transitions correspond to Δτ1=2 transitions in the U(6/4) and U(6/20) supersymmetry schemes and are strictly forbidden in these schemes. For both supersymmetric schemes there is a lack of detailed agreement with the very collective E2 transitions which have Δτ1=0,±1. The triaxial rotor model description of the experimental energies and the collective E2 transitions is the most successful approach. The B(E3) for excitation of several negative-parity states in Ir191 is (4±1)B(E3)sp.

  • Received 29 July 1985

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.33.855

©1986 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

F. K. McGowan, N. R. Johnson, I. Y. Lee, W. T. Milner, C. Roulet, J. Hattula, M. P. Fewell, and Y. A. Ellis-Akovali

  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831

R. M. Diamond and F. S. Stephens

  • Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720

M. W. Guidry

  • University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916 and Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 33, Iss. 3 — March 1986

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×