Elsevier

Nuclear Physics A

Volume 385, Issue 1, 30 August 1982, Pages 133-156
Nuclear Physics A

Polarized deformed spin32 projectile scattering and complex folded potentials

https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(82)90493-6Get rights and content

Abstract

A formalism is presented where polarization observables of all ranks for deformed spin −case32 projectiles are calculated in a parameter-free fashion. Complex optical potentials for the available 7Li + 58Ni elastic scattering data at Elab = 20.3 MeV are obtained from single folding calculations, taking the 7Li ground state to be an α + t cluster in relative p-state. The expansion of the hamiltonian in spin-space generates tensor terms of ranks 2 (TR) and 3 (T3) apart from the usual central and spin-orbit terms. The TR potential fits the second-rank tensor analysing powers quite well without being able to resolve discrete ambiguities of input optical parameters. The T3 term generates a J · L contribution, making the spin-orbit interaction three-component. The 7Li vector analysing power so obtained is negative, but the magnitude is not fully reproduced. Modification of parameters to account for absorption modes not included in the superposition model indicates the need for properly handling dynamical polarization effects due in particular to the low-lying first excited state of 7Li.

References (72)

  • G. Tungate et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1981)
  • W. Weiss et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1976)
  • P. Zupranski et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1980)
  • H. Amakawa et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1976)
  • P.J. Moffa

    Phys. Rev.

    (1977)
  • W.J. Thompson

    Phys. Lett.

    (1979)
  • J.K. Dickens et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1965)
    P.J.A. Buttle et al.F.G. Perey et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1964)
  • J.W. Watson

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1972)
  • J.W. Watson et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1971)
  • A. Rabie et al.

    Miramare-Trieste preprint

    (1980)
  • P. Egelhof et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1980)
    H. Orth et al.

    Z. Phys.

    (1975)
  • D. Mukhopadhyay et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1981)
  • G. Tungate et al.
  • G.R. Satchler

    J. Math. Phys.

    (1972)
  • D.J. Hooton et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1971)
  • K.I. Kubo et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1972)
  • L.R. Suelzle et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1967)
  • J.S. McCarthy et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1977)
  • M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of mathematical functions (Dover, New...
  • L.D. Knutson et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1975)
    F.D. Santos

    Z. Phys.

    (1980)
  • K.O. Pfeiffer et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1973)
    K. Bethge et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1969)
  • B.F. Boyman et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1978)
    S. Kubono et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1977)
  • V. Hnizdo et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett

    (1981)
    G.W. Glover et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1980)
  • H. Ohnishi et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1981)
  • G.R. Satchler

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1960)
  • D. Fick

    Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.

    (1981)
  • F. Petrovich et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1978)
  • J. Meyer et al.

    Nuovo Cim. Lett.

    (1978)
    J. Meyer et al.
  • T.F. Hill et al.

    Ann. of Phys.

    (1980)
  • K. Wildermuth et al.P.D. Kunz

    Ann. of Phys.

    (1960)
    J. Hiura et al.

    Prog. Theor. Phys.

    (1963)
    S. Saito et al.

    Prog. Theor. Phys.

    (1968)
    H. Horiuchi

    Prog. Theor. Phys.

    (1970)
    Y. Suzuki et al.

    Prog. Theor. Phys.

    (1970)
  • P. Zupranski
  • S. Watanabe

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1958)
  • F. Hinterberger et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1968)
    F.G. Perey et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1967)
  • S.G. Kadmenskii

    Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.

    (1969)
  • J.R. Rook

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1965)
  • L.L. Lee et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1964)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text