Elsevier

Nuclear Physics A

Volume 376, Issue 1, 22 February 1982, Pages 81-93
Nuclear Physics A

Effects of short range correlations on one- and two-body properties of nuclei

https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(82)90534-6Get rights and content

Abstract

We evaluate the effects of correlations on one- and two-body densities by developing a low-order approximation (LOA) in the framework of the Jastrow formalism. The accuracy of the method is verified by comparing the predictions for the elastic form factor, the momentum distribution and the inelastic form factor with the results of an exact calculation performed in a model case. It is shown, contrary to what is often believed, that one-body quantities provide an adequate test for the presence of short-range correlations in nuclei.

References (13)

  • O. Bohigas et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1980)
  • M. Gaudin et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1971)
  • J.G. Zabolitzky et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1978)
  • G. Ripka

    Phys. Reports

    (1979)
  • J.L. Friar

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1971)
  • C.Ciofi degli Atti
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (52)

  • Electron scattering from some even fp- and N50-shell nuclei with implanting the influence of short-range correlation functions

    2019, Chinese Journal of Physics
    Citation Excerpt :

    A further method, which is somewhat analogous, is the insertion of the short-range correlation (SRC) in the Slater determinant. Various efforts were made in this trend, relating mostly light closed shell nuclei in the context of the Born approximation [4–11,13–15]. It was originally shown by Czyz and Lesniak [2] that the diffraction nature of the 4He form factor may be qualitatively understood by Jastrow-type [16] correlations.

  • Antisymmetrized Green's function approach to (e,e′) reactions with a realistic nuclear density

    2005, Annals of Physics
    Citation Excerpt :

    All the results presented in the following are normalized to the number of nucleons in the nucleus. The s.p. energies ϵn and the spectroscopic factors λn we have used in the calculation of the W2 contribution are those corresponding to the overlap states obtained in [49] for JCM, in [42] for CBF, and in [50] for GFM, following the method of [51]. The term W2 gives a shift of the calculated response functions that is important to determine the position of the peak and to bring it close to the SM result.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Laboratoire associé au CNRS.

View full text