Recommended standards for gamma-ray energy calibration (1979)

https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-640X(79)90038-XGet rights and content

Abstract

A consistent set of γ-ray energies, all with uncertainties of at most 10 ppm, is recommended for use in the energy calibration of γ-ray spectra. Almost all γ rays listed are from commercially available sources. The half-lives of the isotopes selected are generally at least 30 days. The γ-ray energies, in the range Eγ = 60–6100 keV, are all based on the value of 411 804.4 ± 1.1 eV for the γ-ray from the decay of 198Au. The energy of the 6129-keV line in 16O, which is the γ-ray with the highest energy of the present set, has also been measured relative to another standard; the two values are consistent.

References (30)

  • J.B. Marion

    Nuclear Data Tables A

    (1968)
  • R.G. Helmer et al.

    Nucl. Instr.

    (1978)
  • R.C. Greenwood et al.

    Nucl. Instr.

    (1979)
  • E.R. Cohen
  • J.J. Reidy
  • O. Piller et al.

    Nucl. Instr.

    (1973)
  • G.L. Borchert et al.

    Nucl. Instr.

    (1975)
  • P.H.M. Van Assche et al.
  • R.D. Deslattes

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1974)
  • E.G. Kessler et al.

    Nucl. Instr.

    (1979)
  • G.L. Borchert

    Phys. Lett. A

    (1978)
  • E.R. Cohen
  • E.G. Kessler et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1978)
  • L.G. Smith et al.

    Phys. Rev. C

    (1975)
  • A.H. Wapstra
  • Cited by (101)

    • Nuclear Data Sheets for A=170

      2018, Nuclear Data Sheets
    • Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 211

      2013, Nuclear Data Sheets
    • Gamma-ray energies in the decay of <sup>38</sup>Cl

      2012, Applied Radiation and Isotopes
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is clear that the present results are in very good agreement with those of Warburton et al. and in total disagreement with those of Antony et al. The small difference between the present results and Warburton's (which amounts to about 2 standard deviations for the 1642.7 keV transition) is reduced even further when we account for the changes in the accepted values of the 56Co calibration energies between the time of their work (Helmer et al., 1979) and the time of the present work (Helmer and van der Leun, 2000), which would reduce the deduced energies of Warburton et al. by about 12 eV for 1642.7 keV and 15 eV for 2167.4 keV. The remaining difference is then just over 1 standard deviation for 1642.7 keV.

    • Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 36

      2012, Nuclear Data Sheets
    • Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 56

      2011, Nuclear Data Sheets
    • Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 125

      2011, Nuclear Data Sheets
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    EG & G Idaho, Idaho Falls, Idaho, U.S.A.; work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy

    1

    Task group of the Commission on Atomic Masses and Fundamental Constants of the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics

    SCK-CEN, Nuclear Energy Centre, Mol, Belgium

    View full text