Isospin Nonconservation in the Reaction <span class="aps-inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><mmultiscripts><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi></mrow><mprescripts></mprescripts><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>12</mn></mrow><mrow></mrow><mrow></mrow></mmultiscripts></mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>d</mi><mo>,</mo><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>α</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></mrow><mo>)</mo><mrow><mmultiscripts><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">B</mi></mrow><mprescripts></mprescripts><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow></mrow><mrow></mrow></mmultiscripts></mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>1.74</mn><mn></mn></math></span>, <span class="aps-inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mi>T</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>1</mn><mn></mn></math></span>)

We question the recent conclusion that a simple compound-nucleus interpretation fails for this reaction.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.27.1735

Click to Expand

Physical Review Letters