(p, pn) Reactions at Proton Energies from 0.3 to 3.0 Bev

Samuel S. Markowitz, F. S. Rowland, and G. Friedlander
Phys. Rev. 112, 1295 – Published 15 November 1958
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

Cross sections for (p, pn) reactions on N14, F19, Fe54, Ni58, Cu63, Cu65, Zn64, Mo100, and Ta181 have been measured at proton energies of 0.4 and 3.0 Bev. For F19, Cu65, Mo100, and Ta181 cross-section measurements at several other energies between 0.3 and 3.0 Bev are reported also. Within 30%, all these (p, pn) cross sections appear to be energy-independent in this range. At a given energy the cross sections show greater variations from nucleus to nucleus than can be explained on a purely statistical picture of knock-on processes. Among the lightest nuclei (C12, N14, O16, Fe19), these variations can be correlated with the energy of the lowest lying level of the product nucleus which is stable with respect to particle emission. Among heavier nuclei this correlation disappears, and it is suggested that shell structure effects may be responsible for the fact that the (p, pn) cross sections of Cu63, Cu65, and Zn64 are about 45% higher than those of Fe54 and Ni58. Apart from these individual variations which a statistical theory could not be expected to reproduce, it is found that the recent Monte Carlo calculations of intranuclear cascades by Metropolis et al. do not even predict the right magnitude and energy dependence for the cross sections. The calculated cross sections are too small by factors of 2 to 3 at 0.4 Bev and show a decrease with increasing energy. Possible reasons for these discrepancies are sought in details of the nuclear model used in the calculations. Various mechanisms which may contribute to (p, pn) reactions are discussed. It is concluded that deuteron emission cannot contribute significantly at the energies considered. Processes involving evaporation of one of the nucleons are likely to decrease in importance with increasing energy, whereas the contribution of meson reactions, such as (p, pnπ0), (p, 2pπ), etc., probably increases with energy. The observed energy independence of the cross sections may result from accidental cancellation of such opposing trends.

  • Received 21 July 1958

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.112.1295

©1958 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Samuel S. Markowitz* and F. S. Rowland

  • Departments of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, and Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York

G. Friedlander

  • Department of Chemistry, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York

  • *Present address: Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California.
  • Present address: Department of Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 112, Iss. 4 — November 1958

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Journals Archive

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×