NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 25, 2024. Search: Author = J.M.Hoogduin Found 4 matches. 1997DI05 Z.Phys. A358, 11 (1997) E.Ditzel, J.M.Hoogduin, H.Backe, J.Baumann, F.W.N.de Boer, H.Bokemeyer, M.Debowski, R.Ganz, J.Gerl, T.Happ, M.Kaspar, J.van Klinken, T.Kroll, R.Kulessa, I.Peter, P.Salabura, H.Schaffner, S.Schremmer, K.Vetter, H.J.Wollersheim, H.Xie Absence of E0 Transitions Around 1.8 MeV After Collisions of 238U with 181Ta NUCLEAR REACTIONS 181Ta(238U, X), E=6.0 MeV/nucleon; measured e- spectra, e-(recoil)-coin. 181Ta, 238U deduced σ upper limits for E0 decays. Mini-orange spectrometers, PPAC, Doppler-corrected e- spectra.
doi: 10.1007/s002180050270
1996DI07 Nucl.Instrum.Methods Phys.Res. A376, 428 (1996) E.Ditzel, J.M.Hoogduin, H.Backe, F.W.N.de Boer, H.Bokemeyer, M.Debowski, J.van Klinken, P.Salabura, H.J.Wollersheim, H.Xie Doppler-Corrected Spectroscopy of Conversion Electrons with Mini-Oranges After Heavy-Ion Collisions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 181Ta(238U, 238U'), E=6 MeV/nucleon; measured (projectile)(ce)-, (recoil ejectile)(ce)-coin; deduced precise Doppler corrections for conversion electron emitted with specific solid angle. System of 4 Mini-Orange spectrometers.
doi: 10.1016/0168-9002(96)00260-4
1996HO18 Phys.Lett. 384, 43 (1996) J.M.Hoogduin, E.Ditzel, A.Balanda, F.W.N.de Boer, H.Bokemeyer, J.Gerl, K.Heyde, J.van Klinken, A.Krasznahorkay, P.Salabura, H.J.Wollersheim On the Two First Excited K = 0 Bands in 238U and 240Pu NUCLEAR REACTIONS 238U(α, α'), (α, 2n), E=25 MeV; 181Ta(238U, 238U'), E=6 MeV/nucleon; analyzed I(ce). 238U, 240Pu deduced band structure.
doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(96)00798-8
1993WA12 Phys.Rev. C48, 245 (1993) R.E.Warner, C.L.Carpenter, J.M.Fetter, W.F.Waite, H.W.Wilschut, J.M.Hoogduin Total Nuclear Reaction Probability of 270 to 390 MeV 14N Ions in Si and CsI NUCLEAR REACTIONS I, Cs(14N, X), E=265, 385 MeV; I, Cs(α, X), E=116 MeV; Si(14N, X), E=271, 390 MeV; measured total reaction probability; deduced average reaction σ. Optical, strong absorption model predictions comparison.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.48.245
Back to query form |