References quoted in the XUNDL dataset: 84AS 84GE B- DECAY:0.954 S:XUNDL-1

4 references found.

Clicking on a keynumber will list datasets that reference the given article.


2003AU03

Nucl.Phys. A729, 337 (2003)

G.Audi, A.H.Wapstra, C.Thibault

The AME2003 atomic mass Evaluation (II). Tables, graphs, and references

COMPILATION A=1-293; compiled, evaluated atomic mass data.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.003


2008WIZZ

Proc.4th.Intern.Conf.Fission and Properties of Neutron-Rich Nuclei, Sanibel Island, Florida (2007); J.H.Hamilton, A.V.Ramayya, H.K.Carter, Eds., p.663 (2008); see keynumber 2008WIZS

J.A.Winger, S.V.Ilyushkin, C.J.Gross, K.P.Rykaczewski, D.Shapira, R.Grzywacz, S.N.Liddick, S.Padgett, M.M.Rajabali, J.C.Batchelder, A.Korgul, W.Krolas, C.Mazzocchi, A.Piechaczek, E.F.Zganjar, C.Goodin, J.H.Hamilton

Weakening of the 78Ni core for Z > 28, N > 50?

RADIOACTIVITY 84Ga, 84Ge(β-) [from 235U(p, F)]; measured Eγ, Iγ, βγ-coin.; deduced 84Ge, 84As level scheme, J, π, 84Ga delayed-neutron emission probabilities.


2009AUZZ

Priv.Comm. (2009)

G.Audi, W.Meng, D.Lunney, B.Pfeiffer

Atomic Mass Evaluation 2009


2009LE26

Phys.Rev. C 80, 044308 (2009)

M.Lebois, D.Verney, F.Ibrahim, S.Essabaa, F.Azaiez, M.C.Mhamed, E.Cottereau, P.V.Cuong, M.Ferraton, K.Flanagan, S.Franchoo, D.Guillemaud-Mueller, F.Hammache, C.Lau, F.Le Blanc, J.-F.Le Du, J.Libert, B.Mouginot, C.Petrache, B.Roussiere, L.Sagui, N.de Sereville, I.Stefan, B.Tastet

Experimental study of 84Ga beta decay: Evidence for a rapid onset of collectivity in the vicinity of 78Ni

RADIOACTIVITY 84gGa, 84mGa(β-), (β-n), 84Ge(β-)[from U(γ, X), E=0-50 MeV]; measured Eγ, Iγ, βγ-coin, half-lives. 84Ga, 84Ge, 84As, 83Ge; deduced levels, J, π, delayed-neutron emission probabilities, logft. 83Ge, 84As, 89,90,93,94,96Rb(β-); measured Eγ. PARRNe-ALTO facility. Implications for structure near doubly-magic 78Ni nucleus. Z=32-40 (even), N=52; N=42-54, Z=32; systematics of first 2+ and 4+ states.

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 74,76,78,80,82,84Ge; calculated potential energy surfaces (PES) and B(E2) using HFB+GCM approach.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.80.044308