References quoted in the XUNDL dataset: 61CR 61V B- DECAY:49 MS:XUNDL-2

3 references found.

Clicking on a keynumber will list datasets that reference the given article.


2005GA01

Eur.Phys.J. A 23, 41 (2005)

L.Gaudefroy, O.Sorlin, C.Donzaud, J.C.Angelique, F.Azaiez, C.Bourgeois, V.Chiste, Z.Dlouhy, S.Grevy, D.Guillemaud-Mueller, F.Ibrahim, K.-L.Kratz, M.Lewitowicz, S.M.Lukyanov, I.Matea, J.Mrazek, F.Nowacki, F.de Oliveira Santos, Yu.-E.Penionzhkevich, B.Pfeiffer, F.Pougheon, M.G.Saint-Laurent, M.Stanoiu

Beta-decay studies of neutron-rich Sc-Cr nuclei

RADIOACTIVITY 57,58Sc, 58,59,60Ti, 61V, 62,63,64,65,66Cr(β-) [from 58Ni(76Ge, X)]; measured Eγ, Eβ, βγ-coin, T1/2. 58V, 61Cr, 62Mn deduced levels, J, π. 58V, 61Cr, 62,63,64,65Mn deduced transitions. 60V, 62Mn deduced isomeric states. Comparison with model predictions.

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 58Ni(76Ge, X)57Sc/58Sc/58Ti/59Ti/60Ti/60V/61V/62V/63V/62Cr/63Cr/64Cr/65Cr/66Cr/65Mn/66Mn, E=61.8 MeV/nucleon; measured yields.

doi: 10.1140/epja/i2004-10068-x


2012WA38

Chin.Phys.C 36, 1603 (2012)

M.Wang, G.Audi, A.H.Wapstra, F.G.Kondev, M.MacCormick, X.Xu, B.Pfeiffer

The AME2012 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references

COMPILATION A=1-295; compiled, evaluated atomic mass data.


2014SU07

Phys.Rev. C 89, 034317 (2014)

S.Suchyta, S.N.Liddick, C.J.Chiara, W.B.Walters, M.P.Carpenter, H.L.Crawford, G.F.Grinyer, G.Gurdal, A.Klose, E.A.McCutchan, J.Pereira, S.Zhu

β decay of 61, 63V and low-energy level schemes of 61, 63Cr

RADIOACTIVITY 61,63V(β-), (β-n)[from 9Be(76Ge, X), E=130 MeV/nucleon]; measured Eγ, Iγ, γγ-, (fragment)γ-coin, I(β-), half-lives of 61,63V ground states using A1900 fragment separator, Beta Counting System (BCS) and Segmented Ge Array (SeGA) at NSCL-MSU facility. 61,63Cr; deduced levels, J, π, %β-n, internal-conversion coefficient, multipolarity, configurations. Comparison with shell-model calculations.

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 55,57,59,61Cr; calculated levels, J, π, configuration amplitudes using shell-model with GXPF1A and KB3G interactions. Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.034317