References quoted in the XUNDL dataset: 21F 9BE(14C,PNG):XUNDL-2

5 references found.

Clicking on a keynumber will list datasets that reference the given article.


1966ME19

Phys.Rev. 152, 1002 (1966)

R.A.Mendelson, Jr., R.T.Carpenter

Lifetimes of the First and Second Excited States of 21F

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 18O, 21F; measured not abstracted; deduced nuclear properties.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.152.1002


1967MC05

Phys.Rev. 154, 1101 (1967)

R.E.McDonald, J.A.Becker

Lifetime of the F21 0.28-MeV Level

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 19F, 21F; measured not abstracted; deduced nuclear properties.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.154.1101


1970WA36

Phys.Rev. C2, 2235 (1970)

E.K.Warburton, J.W.Olness

Gamma-Ray Decay of the Low-Lying Levels of F21

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 19F(t, pγ), E approx 3 MeV; measured σ(Ep, Eγ), Doppler shifts. 21F deduced levels, T1/2, γ-branching, J, π.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.2.2235


1983KO01

Phys.Rev. C27, 158 (1983)

R.L.Kozub, J.Lin, J.F.Mateja, C.J.Lister, D.J.Millener, J.W.Olness, E.K.Warburton

Lifetimes of Levels in 20,21F, 22Ne, and 16N

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 7Li(18O, α), (18O, nα), (18O, t), E=10-60 MeV; 7Li(11B, np), E=7-35 MeV; measured Eγ, Iγ, recoil. 21F, 22Ne levels deduced T1/2. 16N, 20F levels deduced T1/2, B(λ). Shell model.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.27.158


2015VO12

Phys.Rev. C 92, 034301 (2015)

J.M.VonMoss, S.L.Tabor, V.Tripathi, A.Volya, B.Abromeit, P.C.Bender, D.D.Caussyn, R.Dungan, K.Kravvaris, M.P.Kuchera, R.Lubna, S.Miller, J.J.Parker, P.-L.Tai

Higher-spin structures in 21F and 25Na

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 9Be(14C, np), E=30, 35, 45 MeV; 9Be(18O, np), E=35 MeV; measured Ep, Ip, Eγ, Iγ, pγ-, γγ-coin, γ(θ), level half-lives by DSAM using ΔE-E telescopes for particles and Compton-suppressed Ge detectors for γ rays at FSU tandem accelerator. 21F, 25Na; deduced levels, J, π, multipolarity, B(M1), B(E1), B(E2). Comparison with previous experimental data, and with shell model calculations using USDA and WBP interactions.

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 21F, 25Na; calculated levels, J, π, B(M1), B(E1), B(E2) using shell model with USDA and WBP interactions. Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034301