References quoted in the XUNDL dataset: 146BA 146CS B- DECAY:0.322 S:XUNDL-7

5 references found.

Clicking on a keynumber will list datasets that reference the given article.

Return to 146CS B- DECAY:0.322 S:XUNDL-7

1990MA25

Phys.Rev. C41, R2469 (1990)

H.Mach, W.Nazarewicz, D.Kusnezov, M.Moszynski, B.Fogelberg, M.Hellstrom, L.Spanier, R.L.Gill, R.F.Casten, A.Wolf

Influence of Shell Effects and Stable Octupole Deformation on the E1 and E2 Transition Rates in the Heavy-Ba Region

RADIOACTIVITY ^142,144,146Cs(β^-); measured βγγ-coin. ^142,144,146Ba levels deduced T_1/2, intrinsic dipole, quadrupole moments. Interacting boson model.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.41.R2469

2017BU07

Phys.Rev.Lett. 118, 152504 (2017)

B.Bucher, S.Zhu, C.Y.Wu, R.V.F.Janssens, R.N.Bernard, L.M.Robledo, T.R.Rodriguez, D.Cline, A.B.Hayes, A.D.Ayangeakaa, M.Q.Buckner, C.M.Campbell, M.P.Carpenter, J.A.Clark, H.L.Crawford, H.M.David, C.Dickerson, J.Harker, C.R.Hoffman, B.P.Kay, F.G.Kondev, T.Lauritsen, A.O.Macchiavelli, R.C.Pardo, G.Savard, D.Seweryniak, R.Vondrasek

Direct Evidence for Octupole Deformation in ¹⁴⁶Ba and the Origin of Large E1 Moment Variations in Reflection-Asymmetric Nuclei

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁰⁸Pb(¹⁴⁶Ba, ¹⁴⁶Ba'), E=659 MeV; measured reaction products, Eγ, Iγ. ^144,146,148Ba; deduced energy levels, J, π, B(Eλ), quadrupole and octupole deformation parameters. Calculated HFB potential energy surfaces, neutron single-particle energies. Coulomb excitation, comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.152504

2020LI32

Nucl.Data Sheets 168, 1 (2020)

J.Liang, B.Singh, E.A.McCutchan, I.Dillmann, M.Birch, A.A.Sonzogni, X.Huang, M.Kang, J.Wang, G.Mukherjee, K.Banerjee, D.Abriola, A.Algora, A.A.Chen, T.D.Johnson, K.Miernik

Compilation and Evaluation of Beta-Delayed Neutron Emission Probabilities and Half-Lives for Z > 28 Precursors

RADIOACTIVITY ^{73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83}Cu, ^{78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85}Zn, ^{79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87}Ga, ^{83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90}Ge, ^{84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92}As, ^{86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95}Se, ^{87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98}Br, ^{91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101}Kr, ^{91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104}Rb, ^{96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107}Sr, ^{97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109}Y, ^{103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113}Zr, ^{103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116}Nb, ^{109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119}Mo, ^{109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122}Tc, ^{114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125}Ru, ^{115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128}Rh, ^{119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131}Pd, ^{120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132}Ag, ^{126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134}Cd, ^{127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137}In, ^{133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140}Sn, ^{134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142}Sb, ^{136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145}Te, ^{137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147}I, ^{141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150}Xe, ^{141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152}Cs, ^{147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154}Ba, ^{147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157}La, ^{153,154,155,156,157,158}Ce, ^{153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161}Pr, ^{158,159,160,161,162,163}Nd, ^{159,160,161,162,163,164,165}Pm, ^{163,164,165,166,167}Sm, ^{165,166,167,168,169}Eu, ^169,170,171Gd, ^{169,170,171,172,173,174}Tb, ^174,175,176Dy, ^{174,175,176,177,178}Ho, ¹⁸⁰Er, ^179,180,181Tm, ¹⁸⁵Yb, ^186,187,188Lu, ^{191,192,193,194}Ta, ^198,199Re, ²⁰³Os, ^203,204,205Ir, ^206,207,208Pt, ^{206,207,208,209,210}Au, ^{209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216}Hg, ^{210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217}Tl, ^{219,220,221,222,223,224}Bi, ^{225,226,227,228,229}At, ²²³Fr(β^-); analyzed available data; deduced β-delayed neutron emission probabilities (Pn) and T_1/2 for known or potential β-delayed neutron precursors. Comparison with systematics using three different approaches.

doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2020.09.001

2021OL03

Phys.Rev. C 104, 034307 (2021)

B.Olaizola, A.Babu, R.Umashankar, A.B.Garnsworthy, G.C.Ball, V.Bildstein, M.Bowry, C.Burbadge, R.Cabellero-Folch, I.Dillmann, A.Diaz-Varela, R.Dunlop, A.Estrade, P.E.Garrett, G.Hackman, A.D.MacLean, J.Measures, C.J.Pearson, B.Shaw, D.Southall, C.E.Svensson, J.Turko, K.Whitmore, T.Zidar

¹⁴⁵Ba and ^{145, 146}La structure from lifetime measurements

RADIOACTIVITY ^145,146Cs(β^-), (β^-n)[from U(p, F), E=478 MeV from TRIUMF cyclotron, followed by mass separation of fragments of interest in the TRIUMF-ISAC facility, and ions stopped in a mylar tape]; measured Eγ, half-lives of levels by βγγ(t) fast timing method using GRIFFIN array with 12 HPGe clover detectors, four cylindrical LaBr₃(Ce) scintillators for fast timing of γ rays, SCEPTAR array of ten plastic scintillators for β tagging, and a thin fast plastic scintillator for β timing signal. ^144,145,146Ba, ^145,146La; deduced levels, J, π, T_1/2 of excited states, B(E1), B(M1), B(E2). Comparison with previous experimental results.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.034307

2021WA16

Chin.Phys.C 45, 030003 (2021)

M.Wang, W.J.Huang, F.G.Kondev, G.Audi, S.Naimi

The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references

ATOMIC MASSES A=1-295; compiled, evaluated atomic masses, mass excess, β-, ββ and ββββ-decay, binding, neutron and proton separation energies, decay and reaction Q-value data.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf