References quoted in the XUNDL dataset: 119RH 9BE(238U,FG):XUNDL-3

2 references found.

Clicking on a keynumber will list datasets that reference the given article.


2015LO04

Phys.Rev.Lett. 114, 192501 (2015)

G.Lorusso, S.Nishimura, Z.Y.Xu, A.Jungclaus, Y.Shimizu, G.S.Simpson, P.-A.Soderstrom, H.Watanabe, F.Browne, P.Doornenbal, G.Gey, H.S.Jung, B.Meyer, T.Sumikama, J.Taprogge, Zs.Vajta, J.Wu, H.Baba, G.Benzoni, K.Y.Chae, F.C.L.Crespi, N.Fukuda, R.Gernhauser, N.Inabe, T.Isobe, T.Kajino, D.Kameda, G.D.Kim, Y.-K.Kim, I.Kojouharov, F.G.Kondev, T.Kubo, N.Kurz, Y.K.Kwon, G.J.Lane, Z.Li, A.Montaner-Piza, K.Moschner, F.Naqvi, M.Niikura, H.Nishibata, A.Odahara, R.Orlandi, Z.Patel, Zs.Podolyak, H.Sakurai, H.Schaffner, P.Schury, S.Shibagaki, K.Steiger, H.Suzuki, H.Takeda, A.Wendt, A.Yagi, K.Yoshinaga

β-Decay Half-Lives of 110 Neutron-Rich Nuclei across the N=82 Shell Gap: Implications for the Mechanism and Universality of the Astrophysical r Process

RADIOACTIVITY 134,135,136,137,138,139Sn, 128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137In, 126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134Cd, 124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132Ag, 121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129Pd, 118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127Rh, 116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124Ru, 112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121Tc, 109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118Mo, 107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115Nb, 106,107,108,109,110,111,112Zr, 104,105,106,107,108,109Y, 103,104,105,106Sr, 102,103Rb(β-) [from Be(238U, X), E=345 MeV/nucleon]; measured decay products, Eγ, Iγ; deduced T1/2; Calculated r-process abundances. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.192501


2017NA04

Phys.Lett. B 767, 480 (2017)

A.Navin, M.Rejmund, S.Bhattacharyya, R.Palit, G.H.Bhat, J.A.Sheikh, A.Lemasson, S.Bhattacharya, M.Caamano, E.Clement, O.Delaune, F.Farget, G.de France, B.Jacquot

Evolution of triaxial shapes at large isospin: Rh isotopes

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 9Be(238U, X)114Rh/115Rh/116Rh/117Rh/118Rh/119Rh, E=6.2 MeV/nucleon; measured reaction products, Eγ, Iγ; deduced level energies, J, π, energy signature splitting. Comparison with the Triaxial Projected Shell Model (TPSM) calculations.

doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.11.020